Skip to content

Masters of the Universe (1987): Epic Villains, Huge Swords, and Cynical Cash Grabs

14
Share

Masters of the Universe (1987): Epic Villains, Huge Swords, and Cynical Cash Grabs - Reactor

Home / Masters of the Universe (1987): Epic Villains, Huge Swords, and Cynical Cash Grabs
Column 80s Fantasy Film Club

Masters of the Universe (1987): Epic Villains, Huge Swords, and Cynical Cash Grabs

He-Man and his weird friends are here to sell toys and save the universe...

By

Published on May 28, 2026

Credit: The Cannon Group

14
Share
Frank Langella and Dolph Lundgren in Masters of the Universe (1987)

Credit: The Cannon Group

In this column, we’re looking back at the 1980s as their own particular age of fantasy movies—a legacy that largely disappeared in the ’90s only to resurface in the 2000s, though in many ways, the fantasy films of the Eighties are far weirder and less polished than what we got in the aughts. In each of these articles, we’ll explore a canonical fantasy movie released between 1980 and 1989 and discuss whatever enduring legacy the film has maintained in the decades since.

For a more in-depth introduction to this series of articles, you can find the first installment here, focusing on 1981’s Dragonslayer. Last time, we looked at the inadvertently surreal cash grab that was Luigi Cozzi’s Hercules (1983). This time, we’ll be exploring yet another dubious Cannon Films production, the less surreal but even more cash-grabby Masters of the Universe (1987).


Now, there might be a bit of a controversy here: Masters of the Universe, with its laser guns and portal-generating devices, is definitely a science fiction film—at least in part. If we include Masters of the Universe in the scope of this column, should we also include fellow ’80s science-fantasy crossbreeds like Flash Gordon or The Empire Strikes Back? That remains to be seen, but for this article I can safely say that while the film certainly has a lot of science fiction props, it plays out like a sword-and-planet fantasy film and there is magic aplenty. I think it counts as fantasy enough for our purposes today. Also, of course, 39 years after the original, an official reboot is slated for release in just about a week (but more on that later). 

I am ever so slightly too young to have experienced the height of the He-Man craze; Mattel’s first Masters of the Universe action figures and comics debuted in 1981, two years before I was born, and the original show ran from 1983-1984 with its spin-off series, She-Ra, running from 1985-1987. As the oldest child in my family, I did not inherit a Castle Grayskull playset from an older sibling and so most of the Masters of the Universe line lurked in the background of my consciousness, with the heavily marketed toy-and-animated show one-two punch of my own childhood being Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. As a result, I first saw the 1987 film about a decade ago as an adult, eager to soak up its bad movie vibes while exploring the Cannon canon, as it were. It’s still a trip.

Briefly: on the distant planet of Eternia, the evil warlord Skeletor (Frank Langella), has imprisoned the Sorceress of Castle Grayskull and uses her magic to oppress the local populace. He-Man (Dolph Lundgren)—who is never called Prince Adam in this version, and is not necessarily even a prince—along with his fellow warriors Man-At-Arms and Teela lead a fight to reclaim their planet. They encounter Gwildor, a gnome-like inventor who designed a “Cosmic Key” capable of teleporting people across the universe. Trusting by nature, he explains that he gave it to Skeletor, allowing him to take the castle. 

The foursome attempt a daring raid to liberate the Sorceress and reclaim the device, only to end up being sent through a portal to Earth, with Skeletor’s warriors in hot pursuit. Orphaned fast-food worker Julie (Courtney Cox) discovers the Key in an open grave (which is inexplicably referred to as a “flowerbed”) on her last night before she’s set to move to New Jersey from the unnamed podunk town in which most of the film takes place. Through a series of misadventures, Julie and the Eternians proceed to lose and pursue the Cosmic Key while being hunted by Skeletor’s lieutenant, femme fatale sorceress Evil-Lyn.

The film spends a lot of time focusing on the Earthlings—Julie, her musician boyfriend Kevin, tough-talking police detective Lubic (James Tolkan, who plays Principal Strickland in the Back to the Future movies), and music store owner Charlie (who looks and dresses uncannily like music industry interviewer Nardwuar). This culminates in a shoot-out at the music store where Evil-Lyn impersonates Julie’s dead mother to take back the Cosmic Key and bring Skeletor and his soldiers through a portal to earth. They capture He-man and grievously wound Julie. 

Now back on Eternia, Skeletor waxes grandiloquent while torturing He-Man, as Man-At-Arms, Teela, Kevin, and Gwildor endeavor to play a badass song though the musically powered Cosmic Key to rescue him. Skeletor is empowered by the magic of the cosmos and declares himself “master of the universe”…all looks lost until the Earth contingent arrives to free He-Man and allow him to reclaim his sword. He screams his catchphrase, “I have the Power!!!” and, after what might be the most lazily choreographed fight scene I’ve ever seen, He-Man triumphs, sending Skeletor to his presumed death.

Freed from Skeletor’s clutches, Kevin and Julie return home, vowing to stay together despite earlier misgivings, but Lubic stays behind in Eternia to shack up with a random hot blonde he met during the climactic fight. In the final scene, Julie realizes she has been sent back in time to the day of her parent’s death, which she is able to prevent by stealing her father’s car keys. He-Man shouts his catchphrase one more time and the film ends. Well, except for the post-credits scene, which promised a sequel that never quite got off the ground in spite of Cannon’s best efforts.

The movie debuted to a somewhat anemic box office, despite being directly tied into the still incredibly popular toy line that started it all, and garnered general critical scorn. It was nominated for a few Saturn awards for costuming and special effects and Billy Barty was nominated for a Razzie but lost to David Mendenhall, the child actor who starred alongside Sylvester Stallone in yet another Cannon Film, Over the Top (the Razzies have never had the classiest of voting boards). 

So, is the movie worth watching? In this case, the short answer is “no.” It has a few buckwild moments that might appeal to aficionados of bad films, but on the whole it’s not even particularly entertaining on that front. It mostly serves as a record of how to fumble a film franchise that should have been low-hanging fruit, making a mess of something that should have at least been fun and relatively watchable, with a built-in audience. Some of that problem is in the script. The film seems to loathe its ostensible subject matter, preferring to devote its minimal efforts at characterization and plot momentum to Julie and Kevin, the random Earth teens. He-Man himself isn’t given anything approaching an arc, and we learn even less about his Eternian companions. According to the screenwriter (The Dark Crystals David Odell), interference from Mattel executives resulted in an array of creative compromises and placed restrictions on the story—for example, He-Man couldn’t be shown to kill a living being, since it might tarnish his image with young toy-buying fans.

Then again, part of that particular problem may lie with Dolph Lundgren. While Lundgren had made an impression with other campy roles, including a small part as a henchman in A View to a Kill and as the villainous Ivan Drago in Rocky IV, he just can’t quite live up to his central role as the champion of Eternia. Supposedly, contractual issues kept director Gary Goddard from redubbing Lundgren’s lines, so what remains is a wooden, stilted performance where Lundgren seems to struggle with the dialogue. He has zero chemistry with his castmates and mostly seems to function as a living action figure—big muscles to build a shot around.

All this leaves the film without a center. Luckily, it’s saved from being completely hollow by Langella and Cox, who are clearly both working hard to make something of their roles. Langella, who apparently took the part because his young son loved the toys, imbues Skeletor with the same Shakespearean grandeur he gave Count Dracula a decade earlier. Skeletor sounds great, though his character design is a ghastly misfire that, of all things, fails to give him the dark eye sockets which are a major part of the original character’s design. That said, the best scenes are the exchanges between him and Meg Foster’s Evil-Lyn, where the figurative moustache-twirling and sexual tension crackles. 

Billy Barty, as Gwildor, a character created for the film (Orko would have been too expense to recreate onscreen, given the low budget), is also trying his best but he is thoroughly hampered by a mask and prosthetics that barely move when he talks. Watching him pour a ramekin of gravy haphazardly into the frozen maw on his face and spilling most of it in the mask’s unsightly beard feels less like a sight gag and more like divine punishment for both Barty and the viewing audience. Gwildor is profoundly annoying and every one of his ridiculous japes is heralded by the other characters in the scene halfheartedly laughing, as if to prompt the audience to follow suit.

More egregious, the film borrows shamelessly from Star Wars—to the point where Skeletor’s soldiers are garbed almost precisely like TIE fighter pilots and march in lockstep to a track that is legally distinct (but little else) from “The Imperial March.” There’s weird product placement as well. Despite the fact that Julie works at a fictional KFC-alike called Robby’s Chicken and Ribs, her boyfriend is seen eating a bucket of actual KFC in one shot and conspicuously tossing out Burger King wrappers in the next. All that, before He-Man pilots a hoverboard past an H&R Block more than once. 

So what legacy does Masters of the Universe leave in its ignoble wake? It certainly marked a big break for Monica Geller herself, Courtney Cox. That, oddly, means a full third of the cast of Friends had their big break in films that revolved around a diminutive fantasy creature with magical powers. Like Langella, Cox’s performance shows that, even though it’s her first starring role (and only her second film), she’s slumming it—coming across as far more charming and grounded than the move deserves, and certainly bringing more to her part than was written.

This also likely marks an important moment in the rather depressing history of films being creatively shackled by toy sales. Mattel’s Masters of the Universe toys, alongside Hasbro’s Transformers (which debuted two years after the original He-Man line) proved that you could lead with retail sales and worry about the creative process later. It’s a cynical way to make art, sure, but it definitely seems to have panned out in Mattel’s favor. 

And then there’s the matter of the reboot coming out on June 5th. While the new film seems to borrow more directly from the animated shows than its cinematic predecessor, trailers clearly show characters who were introduced in the 1987 movie like the cobra-headed Saurod and Karg (the one who looks like a rejected action figure based on The Brood)—still no word if people will continue to pronounce Saurod like “Shiraz” as Meg Foster does. And, at the very least, as a live-action film, it will be stepping into the Cannon movie’s ill-fitting shoes by default. Will it manage to soar above its predecessor? Will it feature He-Man singing 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Going On?” Can it possibly transcend the fatal mistake of casting the internet’s (justifiably) favorite punching bag, Jared Leto, as Skeletor? My answers are possibly, hopefully, and definitely not… but honestly, I’ll just be happy if we can get through this one with no mention of Gwildor.

But what do you think? Have I missed the mark in finding Masters of the Universe to be distinctly un-fun (even in a “so bad, it’s good” way)? Do you see something in Dolph Lundgren’s oiled-up pecs that I don’t? Do you want to talk about how much better She-Ra was, or just remind everyone to go watch She-Ra and the Princesses of Power? Let me know in the comments, and be sure to join us next time when we move from callous cash grab to a high art money pit with The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988). icon-paragraph-end

About the Author

Tyler Dean

Author

Tyler Dean is a Victorian Gothic literature professor at a variety of Southern California colleges. He holds a PhD from the University of California Irvine and is a regular contributor to Artforum. He is the co-writer of the award-winning game, Terratopia: March of the Demon King, currently available on PlayDate.
Learn More About Tyler
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MiriAib
12 days ago

As a late-70s baby I was the perfect age when this movie came out, obsessed with both He-Man and She-Ra and the only thing I remember about it from the time is being profoundly disappointed with how different it was than the cartoon.

Dranon
12 days ago

I missed out on the He-Man craze in the 80s (although, as you pointed out, this movie did too, coming just as its popularity was waning). I caught this film instead in the 90s as one of the movies that seemed to get rerun annually on BBC or ITV (I forget which). For me, it’s right on that knife-edge of good bad movie and bad bad movie, in that I have fond memories of its cheese, and it’s fun to mock with friends, but at the same time there are always a lot more bits that absolutely drag than I remember. It doesn’t help that most of it takes place on earth at night, where it was a lot cheaper to film. Even with all its troubles, the entire cast took the film seriously.

Speaking of budget, at this point Cannon was definitely having financial problems, with knock-on effects to the film’s budget. My understanding is that the big fight scene at the end was filmed after the film’s budget ran out, and the director had to pay his own way, which is why it wasn’t nearly as good as it should have been.

ChristopherLBennett
12 days ago

I’m surprised there’s no mention that Kevin is played by Robert Duncan McNeill, later known as Tom Paris in Star Trek: Voyager (and Nick LoCarno in ST:TNG’s “The First Duty” and Star Trek: Lower Decks).

I remember finding the film underwhelming, and surprising in how inauthentic it was to the animated series, though I guess maybe it was based more on the action figure line and the mini-comics.

Austin Gorton
Austin Gorton
7 days ago

I can assure you, it is as inauthentic to the action figure/minicomics as it is to the cartoon.

tmdean
11 days ago

I had no idea that was Tom Paris until this moment. It’s a thankless part but I think he does as good a job as Cox in selling their terrible material with genuine charm.

Dranon
12 days ago

McNeill occasionally mentions things about filming Masters of the Universe on the podcast The Delta Flyers if something (a location, an actor, etc.) in the discussion of the week’s Star Trek episode reminds him of it.

I believe certain aspects of the movie were inauthentic to the series, action figures, and comics, but Mattel thought they could sell new toys modeled after the movie.

Spender
12 days ago

Never watched the show or had the toys– I was just a smidge too old– so maybe someone can correct me on this: the parallel action set in our “real world” isn’t something that ever happened on the animated series, yes? With the first live-action movie it was likely a cost-saving measure, but why again in the new one? Nostalgia for the old one?

Maybe worth noting that other fantasy franchises of similar vintage did do real-world crossover, like NeverEnding Story, the animated Dungeons & Dragons, and the Beastmaster sequel, so I guess it’s just one of those tropes?

Austin Gorton
Austin Gorton
7 days ago
Reply to  Spender

There’s some precedent to an Earth/Eternia crossover in the animated series – He-Man’s mother is an astronaut from Earth, and some kids from Earth ended up on Eternia in a He-Man/She-Ra Christmas special as Christopher said – but the new film is liking following the trope as a result of the Barbie movie’s similar fantasy-to-reality journey rather than as a result of anything in the cartoon or original film (though my understanding of the new film is that it’s more a case of He-Man being sent to Earth as a kid and growing up knowing about Eternia).

ChristopherLBennett
12 days ago
Reply to  Spender

I think the only time a story was partly set on Earth in the original continuity was in the hourlong Christmas special where Orko was teleported there and brought a couple of Earth kids back to Eternia with him. However, Prince Adam/He-Man’s mother, Queen Marlena, was actually an Earth astronaut named Marlena Glenn, so Adam was half-Terran (as was his twin sister Adora/She-Ra). Marlena had fallen through a black hole into Eternia’s universe, similarly to the title character in Filmation’s earlier series Blackstar, which was kind of a prototype for He-Man, though it was more of a straight high-fantasy universe than Eternia’s blend of magic and high technology.

I think I’ve heard that the filmmakers for the new movie are trying to pay homage to all the earlier incarnations, which would include the Lundgren movie, so maybe that’s the reason for the Earth-based scenes. But yeah, my first reaction when I saw they were doing that was to be reminded of the ’87 film, and I think they probably would’ve done better to distance themselves from it.

Binowru
11 days ago

The thing I remember most from the last time I watched this as an adult (couple years ago) was the hideous pajamas they put Courtney Cox in for the final scene. Yikes. Also, was this before or after her appearing in the Bruce Springsteen video? Had to be before, right?

Greg Cox
Greg Cox
11 days ago

I was in my twenties and a few years out of college when the toys and cartoon debuted, so He-Man pretty much flew under my radar back then. I have no nostalgic connection to the property — and skipped the ’87 movie for that reason — but I’m finding myself tempted to check out the new movie. The trailers are doing a good job of making it seem fun, even for those of us know only know the characters by cultural osmosis.

ra_bailey
11 days ago

I was too old to be caught up in the toy or animation hype for He-Man. I saw the move on VHS rental in the 90’s so the only things I remember about it was that Langella should be cast in more over the top villain roles and Meg Foster and her eyes should be in more films.

Dawfydd
Dawfydd
11 days ago

It’s a very daft film, that massively over-reaches, but I’ve always appreciated that you can really see folks *trying* to make MOTU work.

And I’d be remiss to not shamelessly plug a commentary myself and a friend recorded for our Fluffenbusters channel where we record film commentaries. My co-host Mr White brings some genuinely fascinating insights into jsut how up against the budget the film was…..

https://youtu.be/AxbYlxroC_g?si=ZqP7v3JcSKfUFG4T

Austin Gorton
Austin Gorton
7 days ago

I was the perfect age for this when it came out (six) and a big MOTU fan. It was definitely a case of a young me trying to reconcile “this is nothing like the toys/cartoon” and “but it’s a He-Man movie!” I have enough nostalgia for it that it falls into the “so bad its good” realm for me.

Also, anytime I eat ribs, I think of a Gwildor saying, “I was going to share, I was going to share!” to Man-at-Arms over a bucket of ribs, so it lives on in that capacity.